The vice-presidential debate between JD Vance and Tim Walz this week was one to remember. The two men faced off in New York City, just weeks before election day, giving voters a chance to size up the candidates.

Vance, the Republican senator from Ohio, and Walz, the Democratic governor of Minnesota, tackled a wide range of issues. From immigration to abortion, both men aimed to win over the American public.

But as the night went on, it became clear who the winner was—and it wasn’t Tim Walz. JD Vance’s calm, confident demeanor outshone his opponent. Walz, on the other hand, looked uncomfortable and unprepared, often scribbling on his notepad as if the answers to complex problems could be found with a few quick notes.

For viewers at home, the contrast was striking: Vance appeared presidential, while Walz seemed, well, out of his depth.

Sen. JD Vance, R-Ohio, and Gov. Tim Walz, D-Minn., met face to face on Tuesday night in New York City for the only vice presidential debate before the election.

The event covered a variety of subjects ranging from immigration to climate change to abortion as the two lesser known politicians sought to make their introductions to American voters before election day.

The Night Belonged to Vance

One of the debate’s standout moments came when Vance fact-checked the CBS moderators themselves. Margaret Brennan, one of the moderators, attempted to correct Vance on his comments about illegal immigration. But Vance wasn’t having it. Calmly but firmly, he reminded Brennan of the debate rules, which were clear: no fact-checking by moderators.

It was a bold move, and it showed voters that Vance wasn’t afraid to push back against the media. He’s not going to let the narrative be dictated by anyone, especially not a biased press.

Walz, on the other hand, floundered. One of his most bizarre moments came when he claimed that a Trump-Vance administration would create a “pregnancy registry,” making it harder for women to access contraception and fertility treatments. It was an outrageous statement, and Vance immediately shot it down.

“No, certainly we won’t,” he said, leaving Walz scrambling to explain himself. It was a moment that encapsulated the entire debate: Walz throwing out wild, unfounded accusations while Vance kept his cool and stuck to the facts.

Walz’s Wild Claims Fall Flat

As the debate continued, Walz made several other blunders that left him humiliated. He tried to hit Vance on immigration, claiming that the border crisis was being ignored by Republicans. But Vance flipped the script. He told Walz that while he might want to fix the problem, Kamala Harris certainly didn’t.

“The American citizens have had their lives destroyed by Kamala Harris’s open border,” Vance declared. “It is a disgrace, Tim.” Vance didn’t just win the argument—he owned it. Walz had no response.

Then, there was Walz’s claim about being in China during the Tiananmen Square protests, a falsehood that’s been debunked. Vance didn’t need to mention it—Walz’s credibility had already taken enough hits. But voters certainly noticed the pattern of exaggeration.

Walz has a habit of stretching the truth, and it caught up with him on the debate stage. Vance, on the other hand, stuck to his message: secure the border, protect American jobs, and stop the chaos created by the current administration. It’s a message that resonated, and it’s clear that voters are listening.

Trump Weighs In

Even Donald Trump couldn’t help but pile on after the debate. Walz spent much of the night scribbling on his notepad, and Trump took notice. “Walz is taking so many notes – Never seen a Candidate take more! He needs the notes to keep his brain intact,” Trump joked on Truth Social.

It was a perfect summation of Walz’s performance. He was flustered, relying on his notes to get through the night, while Vance stayed sharp and focused.

Walz’s dependence on his notepad was more than just a quirk. It symbolized his overall performance: scattered, unsure, and constantly playing catch-up. Meanwhile, Vance was composed and quick on his feet, handling the moderators and Walz’s wild claims with ease. This wasn’t just a debate—it was a dismantling.

Vance Emerges Victorious

In the end, there’s no doubt that JD Vance walked away the clear winner. He outmaneuvered Walz at every turn, debunked his falsehoods, and even took on the moderators when they tried to overstep. Walz? He looked outclassed and overmatched. This was his big chance to make an impression on voters, and he blew it.

For those paying attention, the choice is clear. Vance’s performance showed that he’s ready for the national stage. Walz, on the other hand, demonstrated why he’s been relegated to the sidelines of this race. In an election year where voters are looking for strength, leadership, and a willingness to take on tough issues, JD Vance delivered.

Tim Walz? He’ll be lucky if voters even remember his name after this debacle.

Key Takeaways:

• JD Vance dominated the vice-presidential debate, confidently countering both Tim Walz and the CBS moderators.
• Walz stumbled through the night, relying heavily on his notes and making wild claims, including a false statement about a “pregnancy registry.”
• Even Donald Trump mocked Walz’s excessive note-taking, highlighting his scattered performance compared to Vance’s composed and sharp delivery.

Source: Fox News